Answers to Textbook Problems - Chapter 8
1. The import demand equation, MD, is found by subtracting the
home supply equation from the home demand equation. This results
in MD = 80 - 40*P. Without trade, domestic prices and quantities
adjust such that import demand is zero. Thus, the price in the
absence of trade is 2.
2.a. Foreign's export supply curve, XS, is XS = -40 + 40*P. In the absence of trade, the price is 1.
b. When trade occurs export supply is equal to import demand,
XS = MD. Thus, using the equations from problems 1 and 2a, P
= 1.50, and the volume of trade is 20.
3.a. The new MD curve is 80 - 40 * (P+t) where t is the specific tariff rate, equal to 0.5. (Note: in solving these problems you should be careful about whether a specific tariff or ad valorem tariff is imposed. With an ad valorem tariff, the MD equation would be expressed as MD = 80 - 40*((1+t)p). The equation for the export supply curve by the foreign country is unchanged. Solving, we find that the world price is $1.25, and thus the internal price at home is $1.75. The volume of trade has been reduced to 10, and the total demand for wheat at home has fallen to 65 (from the free trade level of 70) while the total demand for wheat in Foreign has fallen to 55.
b. and c. The welfare of the home country is best studied using the combined numerical and graphical solutions presented below in Figure 9-1.
(figure in answer book)
where the areas in the figure are:
a: 55(1.75-1.50) - .5(55-50)(1.75-1.50)=13.125
b: .5(55-50)(1.75 - 1.50) = 0.625
c: (65 - 55)(1.75 - 1.50) = 2.5
d: .5(70 - 65)(1.75 - 1.50)=0.625
e: (65 - 55)(1.50 - 1.25) = 2.50
Consumer surplus change: -(a+b+c+d)=-16.875. Producer surplus
change: a=13.125. Government revenue change: c+e=5. Efficiency
losses b+d are exceeded by terms of trade gain e. [Note: in the
calculations for the a, b and d areas a figure of .5 shows up.
This is because we are measuring the area of a triangle, which
is one half of the are of the rectangle defined by the product
of the horizontal and vertical sides.]
4. Using the same solution methodology as in problem 3, when the
home country is very small relative to the foreign country its
effects on the terms of trade are expected to be much less. The
small country is much more likely to be hurt by its imposition
of a tariff. Indeed, this intuition is shown in the problem.
The free trade equilibrium is now at the price $1.09 and the
trade volume is now $36.40.
With the imposition of a tariff of 0.5 by Home, the new world
price is $1.045, the internal home price is $1.545, home demand
is 69.10 units, home supply is 50.90 and the volume of trade is
18.20. When Home is relatively small, the effect of a tariff
on world price is smaller than when Home is relatively large.
When foreign and home were closer in size, a tariff of .5 by
home lowered world price by 25%, whereas in this case the same
tariff lowers world price by about 5%. The internal Home price
is now closer to the free trade price plus t than when Home was
relatively large. In this case, the government revenues from
the tariff equal 9.10, the consumer surplus loss is 33.51 and
the producer surplus gain is 21.089. The distortionary losses
associated with the tariff (areas b+d) sum to 4.14 and the terms
of trade gain (e) is 0.819. Clearly, in this small country example
the distortionary losses from the tariff swamp the terms of trade
gains. The general lesson is the smaller the economy, the larger
the losses from a tariff since the terms of trade gains are smaller.
5.
The Europeans produce an aircraft worth $50 million, with $30
million of imported inputs. Hence, if there were no subsidy,
the European value-added (contribution) to the aircraft production
would be $20 million.
The governments provide a $10 million subsidy for each aircraft.
This allows the industry to cash a value-added of $30 million.
Hence the effective rate of protection is:
(30 - 20) / 20 = 50%
6. We first use the foreign export supply and domestic import
demand curves to determine the new world price. The foreign supply
of exports curve, with a foreign subsidy of 50% per unit, becomes
XS = -40 + 40(1+0.5) *P. The equilibrium world price is 1.2 and
the internal foreign price is 1.8. The volume of trade is 32.
The foreign demand and supply curves are used to determine the
costs and benefits of the subsidy. Construct a diagram similar
to 8.11 in the text and calculate the area of various polygons.
The government must provide (1.8 - 1.2) * 32 = 19.2 units of
output to support the subsidy. Foreign producers surplus rises
due to the subsidy by the amount of 15.3 units of output. Foreign
consumers surplus falls due to the higher price by 7.5 units of
the good. Thus the net loss to Foreign due to the subsidy is
7.5 + 19.2 - 15.3 = 11.4 units of output. Home consumers and
producers face and internal price of 1.2 as a result of the subsidy.
Home consumers surplus rises by 70 * .3 + .5(6 *.3) = 21.9 while
Home producers surplus falls by 44 *.3 + .5(6*.3) =14.1, for a
net gain of 7.8 units of output.
7. At a price of $10 per bag of peanuts, Acirema imports 200 bags of peanuts. A quota limiting the import of peanuts to 50 bags has the following effects:
a.) The price of peanuts rises to $20 per bag.
b.) The quota rents are ($20 -$10)*50 = $500.
c.) The consumption distortion loss is .5*100 bags*$10 per bag = $500.
d.) The production distortion loss is .5 *50 bags *$10 per bag = $250.