AGRICULTURAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

NEWSLETTER

Steve Sutter, Area Personnel Management Farm Advisor
1720 South Maple Avenue, Fresno, CA 93710
Phone: (209) 456-7560 or (209) 456-7285. FAX: (209) 456-7575

Vol. 7, No. 1, February 1996


SECOND CHANCE

RECOMMENDED UC BOOK FOR NAVIGATING AG LABOR LAWS

The second edition of Labor Management Laws in California Agriculture, now on UC's top-seller list, is a current, compact, integrated, 190-page guide to the myriad federal and state regulations that apply to labor management in farm businesses. This recommended reading, by Howard R. Rosenberg, covers the employment contract, recruitment and hiring, workplace safety and health, wages, benefits, and payroll taxes, and discipline and discharge.

Labor Management Laws in California Agriculture is available at a discount at Fresno County UC Cooperative Extension. Send $14, payable to UC Regents, to Steve Sutter, 1720 S. Maple Ave., Fresno, CA 93702.


MIGRANT AND SEASONAL FARMWORKER RULES ALTERED

In November, President Clinton signed H.R. 1715 amending the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act to affirm that where a State workers' compensation law covers a migrant or seasonal agricultural worker, workers' compensation benefits will be the sole remedy for such worker's loss under MSPA in the case of bodily injury or death.

H.R. 1715 reverses the 1990 Supreme Court ruling that held agricultural workers covered by MSPA could sue for damages over injury or death under the private right of action provided by law, even though the workers are covered for those injuries under State workers' compensation law.

Penalties, though, were raised to $10,000 per plaintiff, up to $500,000, in the case of injuries and deaths that occur where certain motor vehicle safety violations are knowingly committed in the transportation of migrant or seasonal workers. The bill raises current statutory damages from $500 to $10,000, "to deter egregious cases" in which a worker is injured or killed in an accident involving alcohol or drugs, where an employer is a repeat violator, where the employer willfully makes a vehicle dangerous, or where an employer uses an unregistered farm labor contractor.

H.R. 1715 also requires disclosure of information regarding workers' compensation coverage to migrant or seasonal agricultural workers.

Under current law, any person transporting workers must carry a minimum insurance amount against loss for damage to persons or property. Workers' compensation insurance satisfies part of the requirement if the transporter is also the workers' employer. If the transporter is not the employer, the transporter must carry a lofty $1.5 million insurance for carrying 15 or fewer passengers, $5 million for carrying more than 15 passengers. The grower or farm labor contractor who employs the passengers is responsible for having at least $50,000 coverage for property damage.

H.R. 1715, forged bipartisanly "to reflect farmworker and grower interests," addresses the current high liability insurance requirements by giving the Secretary of Labor authority to establish appropriate levels of vehicle insurance coverage required under MSPA. Currently the agency must follow ICC-mandated levels, which have made it prohibitive for those involved in farmworker transportation to get insurance.

The U.S. Labor Department must now promulgate regulations establishing the level of insurance that will be required under MSPA. In preparing a "Notice of Proposed Rule Making," the agency seeks information necessary in making an informed decision, particularly data on the ultimate costs of accidents involving farmworkers, including medical expenses, death benefits, disability payments, and lost wages.

Other helpful information would include reports of accidents involving farmworkers within the last 5 years, the premiums paid for current required insurance by growers or farm labor contractors, the extent workers' compensation covers transportation accidents, and examples of safety programs initiated by ag employers or associations to prevent accidents and keep premiums down. Direct comments to the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division, 2981 Fulton Ave., Sacramento, CA 95821, (916) 979-2040.


INS INVESTIGATIONS "LEAD-DRIVEN"

The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has expanded emphasis on employer sanctions. The agency's 1,300 investigators devote at least 60 percent of their time investigating employer sanctions violations and fraud. Immigration-related investigations and audits are also done by U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Officers. These 1,500 inspectors make over 60,000 employer inspections per year.

Although DOL has access to employers' payroll and time records in inspections, inspectors generally don't compare payroll records with I-9s, instead reviewing I-9s for basic compliance. Paperwork violations are considered "egregious" when I-9s "are so poorly completed as to evidence a lack of intent to comply," or are not certified by the employer.

Although INS randomly picks employers for audit from a data base of all employers withholding payroll taxes, they are mainly chosen for inspection based on tips "providing cause for suspicion the employer has engaged in hiring unauthorized workers."

Usually the INS notes alien registration numbers of employees stating on Form I-9 they're U.S. permanent residents, and then verifies those numbers against Service records. If numbers don't match, INS can inform the employer of the discrepancy by telephone. Although a telephone call is sufficient notice to the employer that it needs to inquire further about the named workers' status, the usual practice is to notify the employer by letter.

The employer can "anticipate" a follow-up visit to assure that the status of the workers in the notice has been verified, or the workers' employment has been terminated. The employer is obliged to do more than just inquire of the worker regarding her or his status. The employer must require the employee to promptly submit different employment authorization documentation. If the worker can't, the employer must terminate employment or be liable for "knowingly continuing to employ an unauthorized worker."



In December, I was chosen Central Region Board Member of the Agricultural Personnel Management Association, representing APMA members in Fresno, Tulare, Kings, Kern, San Luis Obispo, and Santa Barbara Counties. Count on me to coordinate educational meetings in this wide region.


Other Newsletter Issues    |||   APMP Homepage